I’m excited to announce the newest and most affordable poker coaching I’ve ever offered: personalized video reviews. For just $100/hour, half the price of my usual one-on-one coaching, I’ll create a custom video of your tournament or cash game database, a hand history of a tournament or cash game session, or just individual hands on which you’d like my feedback.
Many of you are familiar with my videos on Tournament Poker Edge. Video training sites like TPE offer a tremendous amount of knowledge for a very low price, and I’ve been a member of many over the course of my career.
The real barrier to learning everything you need to know from subscription-based sites isn’t cost, it’s time. There are so many great videos out there that it’s hard to know which ones will best meet your needs, and it’s a real bummer to spend your valuable time watching one that doesn’t address your needs or is just plain bad.
These personalized videos offer the best of both worlds. Like subscription-based sites, they’re a lot cheaper than one-on-one coaching, but they’re a far more efficient use of your time because they are tailored specifically to your needs.
To learn more or to commission a personalized video, please visit https://www.thinkingpoker.net/coaching/poker-coaching-programs/custom-video-review/.
Here’s a full-length sample of what I can offer. It’s an actual video that I created for one of my students. Whether or not you have any interest in commissioning a video for yourself, I hope you’ll find it valuable!
hey andrew. i really like this idea and I think I’ll be contacting you soon. I’ve watched about half and I really like what you’re looking at. I’m going to rewatch it tomorrow after work but I wanted to ask what you think about starting with only 5000 hands? You’re going to see a lot of short term variance in both directions with something that low. I think particularly bb/100 per position, that should shift a ton, as you saw when you get to the hands where your hero calls and his edge was like 1kbb/100. TPE pro Matt posted an article a few days ago where he did some edge analysis, but something that stuck with me was looking at evbb/100. it’s almost like a multiplier to make the number of hands you have more significant. they’re still wild because it only adjusts all ins, but at the very least you immediately cut down stuff like EP vs EP all ins where in the few instances in the small sample he’s like KK vs AA a bunch but his range could be like KK+ vs QQ+ so the evbb/100 would be way smoother. just a thought. I say all of that with all due respect. Would it be possible to look at say mtt hands at stack sizes between like 50bb and 100bb or 0bb and 20bb. As a pretty much mtt only player, I think it would be really awesome to get an in depth look at what’s going on. I do a lot of stuff like that already, but I often feel lost looking at everything. I have plenty of ideas about what different things could mean, but they vary and can be way off base for all I know. and I didn’t forget about sending you the details on the assassinato hand we talked about on twitter. I’ve worked a ton this week, but I’ll get to it before my session Friday. ty ty for the podcast and tpe material and I loved the main event write up you did. I read the first one a few days ago. I really enjoyed it!
Thanks for the kind words and the feedback. You’re right that it would be better to use a larger sample size than this, but this is what this particular student wanted me to look at.
Reviewing a database with a focus on a particular stack size range would be a very good idea. Send me an email with whatever you have and whatever you can say about where you feel weak/lost, where you’d like to focus, etc. and then I’ll make some recommendations about how we should proceed. Don’t worry, I’ll find a way to make it useful to you!
Looks like a great idea. Good luck with this!
Hey Andrew, just a heads up, I went to fill out the forms you linked above. When i tried to submit with ‘video review’ selected it came back with an error telling me I had to make a selection, as if the ‘please select one’ default tab has been replaced by ‘video review’. Anyway not sure if that just happened to me randomly or if its a bug.
Whoops, thanks, I’ve fixed that.
No worries, I just sent it through with a note in the comment section, snap calling on this
Can I ask – when you say it’s $100 per hour, does that mean that for $100 you’ll get an hour long video sent to you in return? Or is it $100 for every hour of your time spent putting the video together (which I’d imagine is significa?
Sorry, I accidentally hit send – as you can probably guess, that last sentence was supposed to read: “Or is it $100 for every hour of your time spent putting the video together (which I’d imagine is significantly greater than a single hour)?”